What’s Ahead for Litecoin After MimbleWimble-Fueled Privacy Is Added?

The Litecoin Summit is unfolding in Las Vegas, and MimbleWimble is center stage.
 Litecoin is on its way to becoming a privacy coin, which for Charlie Lee is about fungibility.
 The privacy push is a risky one that could cost the coin exchange listings in some countries.
 It’s no secret that Litecoin wants to become a privacy coin.
 Litecoin Creator Charlie Lee made that clear when he revealed a change in direction for the project, chief among which involved partnering with a Grin developer David Burkett to implement the MimbleWimble protocol and use extension blocks for privacy and scalability on the network.




 Privacy has been a major theme in the cryptocurrency market, one that has cost some high-profile coins, including Zcash and Monero, exchange listings in Japan.
 Charlie Lee is willing to take that chance, saying at the Litecoin Sumit in Las Vegas: “There’s definitely a risk, but I think the way we’re approaching it is pretty safe.”
 For Lee, however, it’s really about fungibility, which makes it so 1 LTC = 1 LTC regardless of which Litecoin is being spent, and that can’t be achieved without privacy.
 “The public nature of the history of the coin makes it so that people can censure you based on which coin you are spending.
 And I’d like to see that changed,” said Lee. The timing couldn’t be better, with China now declaring that blockchain is its best friend so that the government can use the distributed ledger to spread its tentacles to keep closer tabs on its citizens.
 The stakes have never been higher and neither has the uncertainty. “Of course, there’s going to be a risk. Potentially some countries, maybe Korea or Japan maybe they might take another look at Litecoin with MimbleWimble and say this is too risky but I guess there’s really no progress without risk.”
 Considering that Litecoin isn’t the first privacy coin on the scene, Lee has the benefit of hindsight. He has been exploring the reception a MimbleWimble-fueled LTC will get by exchanges and seems confident that they will treat it as the “status quo,” especially since the MimbleWimble extension blocks (EB) will be opt-in. In other words, exchanges can simply choose to ignore the confidential transaction capabilities and stick with the Litecoin chain they’ve come to know.
Follow me on
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/crypto-expert20
IF you be an admin for your telegram group you can order from the link


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SEC’s discussion with Bitcoin ETF issuers has moved into a key stage

What’s Causing the Current Bitcoin Crash and How Low Can it Go

BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF Now Invites Participation From Wall Street Banks